Novice researchers are often discouraged from making use of the first person pronouns I and we also in their writing, and the most common reason given with this is the fact that readers may regard such writing as being subjective, whereas science is about objectivity. However, there’s absolutely no universal rule against the employment of the initial person in scientific writing.
Dr. David Schultz, the writer for the book Eloquent Science 1 , go about finding out whether it is ok to utilize the person that is first scientific writing. He looked up a number of books on writing research papers. He unearthed that several guides on writing academic papers actually advocate the usage of the first person.
A Scientific Paper, Robert Day and Barbara Gastel say for example, in How to Write and Publish
Because of this avoiding first person pronouns in scientific writing, the scientist commonly uses verbose (and imprecise) statements such as “It was found that” in preference to your short, unambiguous “I found.” Young scientists should renounce the false modesty of these predecessors. Do not be afraid to mention the agent associated with the action in a sentence, even though it is “I” or “we.”
A number of the world’s most renowned scientists have used the first person, as explained inThe Craft of Scientific Writing:
Einstein occasionally used the person that is first. Feynman also used the person that is first occasion, as did Curie, Darwin, Lyell, and Freud. So long as the emphasis remains in your work and never you, nothing is wrong with judicious utilization of the person that is first.
Perhaps among the best grounds for utilizing the person that is first writing is given within the Science Editor’s Soapbox:
“It is thought that…” is a phrase that is meaningless unnecessary exercise in modesty. Egy kattintás ide a folytatáshoz….